Wednesday, 15 April 2009
-

Currently
Windfall (The Weather Warden, Book 4)
By Rachel Caine
see relatedThe cost of dying and other stories...
Recession leaves funeral business in grave state
I have long thought the funeral industry a predatory industry, perhaps this is unjust, but it is still my opinion. On the face of it, we really don't have much of a choice, you cannot just wrap Uncle Harry in newspaper and bury him in the garden. I understand that the "home funeral" is making a comeback, but there are lots of considerations that surround that option that can be painful or hazardous. The other side of the coin is the $5000 (on the average) that a mortuary funeral costs. It seems rather excessive, and while I admit that I do not know what goes on behind the scenes, even buying a simple pine casket for $1000 seems rather excessive and I can buy a pine table with much more wood for less than half of that price. I have been involved in a few funerals and have seen the pressure that these people bring to bear on people who may be grief stricken and not thinking clearly. I cannot say that I am surprised at this turn of events.Right-wing extremism may be on rise, report says
How often do we hear about "left-wing" extremism? A quick search of Google showed about 47 thousand hits for "left-wing extremism" and a cursory glance showed these are mainly from conservative sites and blogs. On the other hand, a search for "right-wing extremism" turned up about 860 thousand hits and a cursory glance showed those to be coming from news organizations and blogs. I find it enlightening that the Neo-Nazis, the KKK and a few other groups of people align themselves with the "right". If I were over there on the right, I would probably want to look around and see who I was standing with.
Post a Comment
- Back to erehwyna's Xanga Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in erehwyna's local time zone: GMT -06:00 (Central Standard - US, Canada)


Comments (8)
Yeah, maybe because the majority of media outlets just so happen to be LEFT WING and of course are going to demonize any voice of dissent. A UCLA study confirms this http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/Media-Bias-Is-Real-Finds-UCLA-6664.aspx
BTW, the KKK is run particularly by pro-segregation, pro-slavery Democrats like Senator Robert Byrd.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58295
Not to mention that nazism, neo-nazism included, was particularly a left-wing ideology. The only thing that made it different from communism was the segregation of classes. Otherwise, it was all based on government control.
If anything is far-right, it would be anarchism.
And I'm guessing you think these tea parties were all started by right-wing extremists? That's what the CNN article is referring to. If that's true, then proud, normal everyday American citizens who are against tax increases and government spending are all right-wing extremists. These are protests started from the bottom up and are not backed by any organizations or sponsored by any politicians or media pundits (unlike liberal protests, which are usually backed by George Soros, media matters, moveon.org, and special interest groups like ACORN and Code Pink).
@Chibi_Son_Gokou - It is nice that you can make up your own definition of what a right-wing extremist group is and can even find people to agree with your view. I can find people who still believe the earth is flat and find others who agree with them also. One political party generally accepted as being right-wing extremist is the American Nazi Party, go figure.
As far as the wet teabag protest, it is amusing that you believe that this was a bottom-up effort. Even more amusing is that most of the people there could not agree on what they were protesting. Laughably, unless there were people there making over $250,000 a year, they all got tax cuts this year, proving once again that people who don't think for themselves can be made to do anything.
Well I can also point out that Obama is just like Hitler. Hitler was young, charasmatic candidate who appealled especially to the younger crowd. His grudge against the Jews was that they were rich bankers who were thriving while everyone else in Germany was suffering during a recession. His promises for change and hope turned out to be the exact opposite of what people thought. I think everyone who voted for Obama was played for a fool.
Yeah, everyone who made less than $250,000 got a tax cut (except those who smoke) yet most of the people who make less than $250,000 a year make up a vast majority of the 600,000 people per month losing their jobs. Not to mention that half the people in the country don't even file an income tax return unless they want to claim a refund.
And yes, the tea parties are a bottom up protest started by average Americans with a common belief. There was a huge article about it in the Wall Street Journal this past week explaining the 500 tea parties that took place this past Wednesday.
@Chibi_Son_Gokou - Yes, of course, everyone who is young and charismatic is Adolph Hitler in disguise and we need to kill them now. (Please check for HEAVY sarcasm.)
Apparently you are just like the rest of your kind, you don't care WHAT you complain about as long as you are pointing out what you consider a fault. If you wanted your tax refund last year, you had to file then also, it was SUCH a hardship. On top of that, you are talking about the 600,000 people a month who are losing this jobs thanks to your parties policies. Thanks for letting me point that out.
As usual, you don't pay attention, who do you think runs Americans for Prosperity and Freedom Works? And do you know what roll these organizations played? Probably not, if Rush didn't tell you, you don't know about it. If you check carefully, the article in the WSJ is NOT an article, it is a column, columnists print opinions. What's even funnier is that Glenn Reynolds is a pro-gay marriage, pro-abortion, conservative libertarian. He is quoted as saying "I'd be delighted to live in a country where happily married gay couples had closets full of assault weapons." I love your source. I'd even vote for him as my senator were he ever to run outside of Tennessee.
Why don't you read the rest of my comparison before commenting on it?
Yes, I do care what I'm complaining about. I know for a fact that if the government continues to practice wreckless spending, particularly for government programs that are useless and a waste of money with money that virtually doesn't exist, not only is EVERYONE going to pay more in taxes, but the next several generations will be in debt as the national defecit is expected to almost tripple in size. While I don't agree with the wishy-washiness of the Republican Party, their policies are sure as hell better than the anti-capitalist Democrats who are disillusioned into thinking that government is the solution in saving the economy when in fact there has never been a period in the history of the United States or any country in the world for that matter where increased government control and spending created a thriving economy. If anything, government control and spending only makes the economy worse. FDR's New Deal prolonged the Great Depression by seven years. And btw, I thought this new stimulus bill that was supposed to save the economy and create new jobs was supposed to solve everything. You even posted a blog entry trying to drive a point that a whole bunch of new jobs were included in the new stimulus bill. Where are they? Why are foreclosures and unemployment continuing to spike when the stimulus bill was suppose to bring those to a halt or considerably reduce that? A TRUE fiscal conservative would agree that the decisions being made by the democrats controlling the government are bad ones (not to mention the democrat controlled states like Michigan and New York that have the worst economies in the country).
So just because it was information in a column, it's not credible? Opinion is based on fact. So just because Americans for Prosperity and Freedom Works is involved with the tea parties, they're not credible? The tea parties weren't started by them. Why is it okay for George Soros, MoveOn.org, and the Daily Kos to sponsor far-left protests?
@Chibi_Son_Gokou - Yes - everyone is going to pay more because the GOP ran up a HUGE debt by spending money like water and not balancing that spending with something a lot like taxes to offset it. Everyone is going to pay more beacuse the GOP decided to retaliate against the Taliban for 911 - and then to invade a sovereign country without cause or provocation, then they decided to place their resources mainly on the invasion instead of fighting the real war against terrorists. They decided to fund this war outside of the budget so that people like you did not see how much of your money they were spending. They cut taxes for the rich in a stupid ploy to "stimulate the economy" while for the first time in the history of America the children of Americans could no long look forward to living better than their parents and the median income for Americans dropped, their policies have pushed higher paying jobs out of this country and they have replaced them with minimum wage service sector jobs, their policies have resulted in millions of Americans living without even basic health insurance and they have denied insurance benefits to children because a few people might get benefits who did not need them. So, the policies and actions of the GOP during the 6 years when they had TOTAL control of our government have resulted only in disaster for the majority of Americans. I won't even start on things like how deregulation and lack of enforcement in the financial sector allowed this economic meltdown to happen and to what the world thinks of America after the actions taken while the GOP was in control.
Now, after everything they have done, THEY believe that only they have the solution to the problems, and that solution is to do EXACTLY what they did to screw everything up. Pardon me, but no way in hell am I going to agree to that.
As to the fallacy of FDR and the great depression, you can say anything you want about things that didn't happen, but unless you happen to have a time machine in your back pocket and can go back and do it BOTH ways and see which one was better you can make no statements, and conjecture on the economy coming from the GOP just strikes me as propaganda.
Finally, if you have a fully loaded freight train going downhill and it has been building speed for 8 years, you are not going to stop it, or even slow it down much for a good while. The largest economy in the world is not going to stop and turn on a dime. Only people with no grasp of reality, or ones who just want to complain for the sake of it are going to expect things to change rapidly, but then - we have had that conversation just above - haven't we?
Why do you continue to create all these strawman arguments against the GOP? You either don't think your party should be held accountable for anything and all the blame should be placed on the opposing party (not surprising), or you believe everything the liberal media (NPR, New York Times, MSNBC, etc.) tells you as if it were gospel.
While the Bush Administration did spend like liberals, their spending is like pennies compared to what the Obama Administration and the democrat-backed Congress has or what they plan to spend. Lets forget about what happened in the past for a moment and focus on what's going on NOW. The Obama Administration does not plan to reduce the defecit. Instead, they plan to tripple it in size by printing money that virtually doesn't exist. As far as taxes go, have you ever heard of the Laffer Curve before?
The GOP alone retaliated against the Taliban? Better check your sources (not the biased ones). The war in Afghanistan was backed by a lot of democrats in Congress, and now Obama wants to send more troops over there. Do you disagree with that as well? Same thing is true for the Iraq war (until they decided to flip flop when the going got rough). Your definition of a "soverign" nation must be an autoritarian dictatorship that fills mass graves of its own citizens (after raping and torturing them), has been in open conflict with the US for over a decade, and has even attempted an assassination of a former US President. Not to mention Saddam's 17 violations of the same UN resolution, where only violating it the first time should have led to his removal according to the terms.
The only people who don't like tax cuts for the rich are liberal democrats dependent on government welfare programs. I don't know where you were in those six years of republican control, but things were great then. Now we have democrat control, and things are not so great, and they're going to be worse if the democrats carry out their plans of turning the United States into a socialist nation.
@Chibi_Son_Gokou - I create nothing. I RELATE history because people seem to be in the process of twisting the events of the past into fantasies.
It was not the Bush administration that spent like liberals, it was the (GOP controlled) Congress and the Senate, the president can spend very little without their approval.
How can we POSSIBLY have a future if we forget about the past? And why was it OK for the GOP to double the deficit? And do you know WHERE the various income groups lie on the Laffer Curve? Please, don't try to throw in random economic elements without data, you cannot begin to change my mind with empty economic curves. If we don't forget the past for the moment, we know that a return to the Clinton era tax rules, which is all that they have proposed to date, did not put the rich over the top on the Laffer Curve.
The war is Afghanistan is actually the only valid war we are involved in, nice job of twisting tough. I actually approve of the retaliation, if you take the sentence in context, (if that is possible), you will see that it is a feeder into the next to show that they then diverted their attention to Iraq.
"Sovereignty is the right to exercise, within a territory, the functions of a state, exclusive of any other state, or Kingdom and subject to no other authority. A sovereign is a supreme lawmaking authority." I know - I shouldn't confuse you with facts. How about ignoring Korea and allowing them to become EXACTLY what they were saying Iraq was, a country with weapons of mass destruction capable of delivering them to remote locations in minutes.
You tout the UN resolution and yet we invaded Iraq without their approval after totally ignoring what their inspectors were saying. Just stop yourself, you are trying to change history yet again.
You must live in some fantasy land, and I tire of constantly having to remind you of the truth, not the truth of the "liberal media" but the truth of the government facts and figures regarding income, housing, poverty, education, and other "quality of life" components. I could tell you that based on that data, the Amreican Dream died in 2001. Since you seem to doubt anything I can show you, you will have to go do the research yourself, if you are capable of doing so, from the government information available. The data is there if you look, try www census.gov, but then I am sure that you believe all government data has been skewed by liberals. At any rate, I find it so enlightening that you still believe that all those years of abuse and neglect could be undone is 3 months, that I am actually lowering my estimation of your grip on reality, if that is at all possible.
Finally, the polls are showing that apparently more that half of the people in the US are for raising taxes on the rich, so apparently you have managed to turn more than half the country into "liberal democrats on welfare". Good job!